Smart Health Talk
Join Us:
  • Home
    • Suggest Topics
  • Show Schedule
    • US EPA Glyphosate Assessment 1984
    • Top Organic Product Recommendations
    • Sign Up for Alerts
    • Organic and Non GMO Resources
    • March Against Monsanto Global
    • March Against Monsanto States A-M
    • March Against Monsanto States N-Z
    • Say No GMOs Miscellaneous
    • Say No GMOs Global
    • Say No GMOs A-G
    • Say No GMOs H-Q
    • Say No GMOs R-Z
    • Say No GMO Various Organizations
  • Howard Vlieger - MAAM Interview
    • Moms Across America March Zen Honeycutt
    • Jay Feldman Beyond Pesticides
    • Farmed Salmon Infected With Viruses
    • Vermont Rep. Kate Webb on GMO Bill
    • Howard Vlieger Slide Show
    • SB 1381 Label GMOs California
    • GMOs for Dummies
    • GMOs, phthalates, antibiotics making us fat!
    • GMO French Study
    • Russian GMO Worldwide Reality Show
    • Vandana Shiva on GMOs
    • Genetic Roulette Movie
    • Opponents of Prop #37
    • GMO Produce Labeling Myth
    • Dr. Benbrook Interview
    • Pesticides in Our Food
    • PESTICIDE RISK
    • Elle Cochran and Kate Webb
    • Elle Cochran Hawaii GMO Labeling
    • GMO Videos Hawaii
    • Venus Williams Videos
  • Podcast Vanishing Bees
    • Judy Hoy on Potato Pesticide Related Mutations
    • Antibiotic Resistance & Organic Meats >
      • Bacteriophages
    • Honey Bee Extinction
    • Kettle Pop Expo West
    • Sue Nesbitt Olympic Coach
    • Sue Nesbitt Press Release
    • Podcast GlobalGardensOnline.com
    • Videos GlobalGardensOnline.com
    • Press Release GlobalGardensOnline.com
    • Theo Stephan Pecan Pie Recipe
    • Dr. Tarique Perera Mental Health
    • Dr. Al Plechner Top Veterinarian
    • Heartburn Remedies and Gypsy Tea
    • Kevin Sorbo for Kids
    • Roasted Chicken Gluten Free Meal
    • Sustainable Seafood & Organic Shopping
    • David Binkle LAUSD Foodservice
    • Dr. Michael Hansen & Vegan Eating
    • Local Urban Foragers-Alvarado Bakery-Elle Cochran
    • Tyson Flick-Chef Rene-Eric Hoffman-Katrina Frey-Starkie Sowers
    • Dan Bahou Recycling-LAUDS Foodservice
    • Goodbelly-Vanishing of the Bees-Seasnax-Tasty Brand-Really Raw Honey-Nature's Path
    • Sustainable Seafood-Three Sisters Farm
    • Ben and Jerry's Ice Cream Goes GMO
    • Numi Non GMO Teabags vs GMO Corn Plastic Teabags
    • Tieman's Coffee-Veggie Grill-Waldorf Salad-Highland Springs Ranch-Stacy Hall-ElaineCSA-Mozzarella Salad
    • Highland Spring Ranch-CSA
    • Stacey Hall-Elaine McFadden Intro to Show
  • Gardening
    • Two Minute Gardening Tips
    • More Gardening Ideas
    • Companion Planting
    • What's in Season
  • News
    • Expo West
    • Rodale Institute Coach Mark Smallwood
    • Coach Smallwood from Rodale Research Institute On The Road
    • LA Green Festival
    • Expo West 2014 New Product Highlights
    • TransPacific Partnership Agreement
    • Dr. Benbrook Press Release
    • Blog
    • Public Health
    • Christmas Holiday Recipes
    • Kid Fun Christmas
    • Organic Recipe Blog
    • Organic Product Blog
    • EPA Mercury Announcement
    • Everyday is Earth Day >
      • Earth Day Quiz
      • Earthcasts
      • Earthcasts from Space
      • Earth Children
  • Resources
    • More Resources
    • Organic Stocking Stuffers
    • Fast Organic Holiday Ideas
    • Holiday Recipes
    • Green Halloween Treats
    • Organic Treats
    • Favorite Organic Valentine Treats >
      • Valentine Organic Chocolate Gifts Large View
    • Easter Organic Chocolate Gifts
    • Organic Easter Baskets
    • Organic and Vegan Chocolate Favorites
    • Organic Hard Candy Chewies & Gummies
    • Keepin' It Hot Chicken Dinner >
      • Cooking the Meal
      • Prepare "Keeping it Hot Chicken"
    • Seafood Resources >
      • Sustainable Seafood Resources
      • Sustainable Seafood Shopping
      • Seafood Recipes
      • More Seafood Recipes
      • Seafood Nutritional Benefits
      • Seafood Education
      • Farmed Salmon Viruses Explained
    • 10 Smart Health Resolutions >
      • 10 Smart Health Resolutions #1
      • 10 Smart Health Resolutions #2
      • Calories Burned During Activities
      • 10 Smart Health Resolutions #3
      • 10 Smart Health Resolutions #4
      • 10 Smart Health Resolutions #5
    • 10 Smart Health Resolutions Con't >
      • 10 Smart Health Resolutions #6
      • 10 Smart Health Resolutions #7
      • 10 Smart Health Resolutions #8
      • 10 Smart Health Resolutions #9
      • 10 Smart Health Resolutions #10
    • Signs of a Heart Attack
    • America Recycles Day Broadcast 2014
    • Recycling Information >
      • 15 Tips for Recycling Day Anniversary
      • Recycling Tips
      • Recycled Products
      • Recycling Centers
      • What You Can and Cannot Recycle
      • Waste Reduction
      • Plastic Pollution-Expert Advice-Aly the Albatross
    • Sulfite Containing Foods
    • Aspartame Risks
    • GMO Tryptophan Verified - Energy Drinks and Kids
  • About Us
    • Listen Live on the Radio
    • Listen 24-7 With Podcasts
    • Listen Live on Your Computer
    • Listen Live on Your Cell Phone
    • Smart Health Talk Theme Song
    • Contact Us

Home

Talk Show Schedule

Show Health Topics

Podcast

Gardening

Suggest a Topic

News

Blog

About Us



Picture
HOW THE EPA LOOKS AT PESTICIDE ASSESSMENT
Assessing Health Risks from Pesticides
Este Web page está disponible en español

Current as of: April 5, 2007
735-F-99-002

The Federal Government, in cooperation with the States, carefully regulates pesticides to ensure that they do not pose unreasonable risks to human health or the environment. As part of that effort, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) requires extensive test data from pesticide producers that demonstrate pesticide products can be used without posing harm to human health and the environment. EPA scientists and analysts carefully review these data to determine whether to register (license) a pesticide product or a use and whether specific restrictions are necessary. This fact sheet is a brief overview of EPA’s process for assessing potential risks to human health when evaluating pesticide products.

BackgroundThere are more than 1055 active ingredients registered as pesticides, which are formulated into thousands of pesticide products that are available in the marketplace.

EPA plays a critical role in evaluating these chemicals prior to registration, and in reevaluating older pesticides already on the market, to ensure that they can be used with a reasonable certainty of no harm. The process EPA uses for evaluating the health impacts of a pesticide is called risk assessment.

EPA uses the National Research Council’s four-step process for human health risk assessment:

Step One: Hazard Identification
Step Two: Dose-Response Assessment
Step Three: Exposure Assessment
Step Four: Risk Characterization

Step One: Hazard Identification (Toxicology)The first step in the risk assessment process is to identify potential health effects that may occur from different types of pesticide exposure. EPA considers the full spectrum of a pesticide’s potential health effects.

Generally, for human health risk assessments, many toxicity studies are conducted on animals by pesticide companies in independent laboratories and evaluated for acceptability by EPA scientists. EPA evaluates pesticides for a wide range of adverse effects, from eye and skin irritation to cancer and birth defects in laboratory animals. EPA may also consult the public literature or other sources of supporting information on any aspect of the chemical.

Step Two: Dose-Response AssessmentParacelsus, the Swiss physician and alchemist, the “father” of modern toxicology (1493-1541) said,

"The dose makes the poison."

In other words, the amount of a substance a person is exposed to is as important as how toxic the chemical might be. For example, small doses of aspirin can be beneficial to people, but at very high doses, this common medicine can be deadly. In some individuals, even at very low doses, aspirin may be deadly.

Dose-response assessment involves considering the dose levels at which adverse effects were observed in test animals, and using these dose levels to calculate an equal dose in humans.

Step Three: Exposure AssessmentPeople can be exposed to pesticides in three ways:

  1. Inhaling pesticides (inhalation exposure),
  2. Absorbing pesticides through the skin (dermal exposure), and
  3. Getting pesticides in their mouth or digestive tract (oral exposure).
Depending on the situation, pesticides could enter the body by any one or all of these routes. Typical sources of pesticide exposure include:

  • Food 
    Most of the foods we eat have been grown with the use of pesticides. Therefore, pesticide residues may be present inside or on the surfaces of these foods. 

  • Home and Personal Use Pesticides 
    You might use pesticides in and around your home to control insects, weeds, mold, mildew, bacteria, lawn and garden pests and to protect your pets from pests such as fleas. Pesticides may also be used as insect repellants which are directly applied to the skin or clothing. 

  • Pesticides in Drinking Water 
    Some pesticides that are applied to farmland or other land structures can make their way in small amounts to the ground water or surface water systems that feed drinking water supplies. 

  • Worker Exposure to Pesticides 
    Pesticide applicators, vegetable and fruit pickers and others who work around pesticides can be exposed due to the nature of their jobs. To address the unique risks workers face from occupational exposure, EPA evaluates occupational exposure through a separate program. All pesticides registered by EPA have been shown to be safe when used properly.
Step Four: Risk CharacterizationRisk characterization is the final step in assessing human health risks from pesticides. It is the process of combining the hazard, dose-response and exposure assessments to describe the overall risk from a pesticide. It explains the assumptions used in assessing exposure as well as the uncertainties that are built into the dose-response assessment. The strength of the overall database is considered, and broad conclusions are made. EPA’s role is to evaluate both toxicity and exposure and to determine the risk associated with use of the pesticide.

Simply put,

RISK = TOXICITY x EXPOSURE.

This means that the risk to human health from pesticide exposure depends on both the toxicity of the pesticide and the likelihood of people coming into contact with it. At least some exposure andsome toxicity are required to result in a risk. For example, if the pesticide is very poisonous, but no people are exposed, there is no risk. Likewise, if there is ample exposure but the chemical is non-toxic, there is no risk. However, usually when pesticides are used, there is some toxicity and exposure, which results in a potential risk.

EPA recognizes that effects vary between animals of different species and from person to person. To account for this variability, uncertainty factors are built into the risk assessment. These uncertainty factors create an additional margin of safety for protecting people who may be exposed to the pesticides. FQPA requires EPA to use an extra 10-fold safety factor, if necessary, to protect infants and children from effects of the pesticide.

Types of Toxicity Tests EPA Requires for Human Health Risk AssessmentsEPA evaluates studies conducted over different periods of time and that measure specific types of effects. These tests are evaluated to screen for potential health effects in infants, children and adults.

Acute Testing: Short-term exposure; a single exposure (dose).

  • Oral, dermal (skin), and inhalation exposure
  • Eye irritation
  • Skin irritation
  • Skin sensitization
  • Neurotoxicity
Sub-chronic Testing: Intermediate exposure; repeated exposure over a longer period of time (i.e., 30-90 days).

  • Oral, dermal (skin), and inhalation
  • Neurotoxicity (nerve system damage)
Chronic Toxicity Testing: Long-term exposure; repeated exposure lasting for most of the test animal's life span. Intended to determine the effects of a pesticide after prolonged and repeated exposures.

  • Chronic effects (non-cancer)
  • Carcinogenicity (cancer)
Developmental and Reproductive Testing: Identify effects in the fetus of an exposed pregnant female (birth defects) and how pesticide exposure affects the ability of a test animal to successfully reproduce.

Mutagenicity Testing: Assess a pesticide's potential to affect the cell's genetic components.

Hormone Disruption: Measure effects for their potential to disrupt the endocrine system. The endocrine system consists of a set of glands and the hormones they produce that help guide the development, growth, reproduction, and behavior of animals including humans.

Risk ManagementOnce EPA completes the risk assessment process for a pesticide, we use this information to determine if (when used according to label directions), there is a reasonable certainty that the pesticide will not harm a person’s health.

Using the conclusions of a risk assessment, EPA can then make a more informed decision regarding whether to approve a pesticide chemical or use, as proposed, or whether additional protective measures are necessary to limit occupational or non-occupational exposure to a pesticide. For example, EPA may prohibit a pesticide from being used on certain crops because consuming too much food treated with the pesticide may result in an unacceptable risk to consumers. Another example of protective measures is requiring workers to wear personal protective equipment (PPE) such as a respirator or chemical resistant gloves, or not allowing workers to enter treated crop fields until a specific period of time has passed.

If, after considering all appropriate risk reduction measures, the pesticide still does not meet EPA’s safety standard, the Agency will not allow the proposed chemical or use. Regardless of the specific measures enforced, EPA’s primary goal is to ensure that legal uses of the pesticide are protective of human health, especially the health of children, and the environment.

Human Health Risk Assessment and the LawFederal law requires detailed evaluation of pesticides to protect human health and the environment. In 1996, Congress made significant changes to strengthen pesticide laws through the Food Quality Protection Act (FQPA). Many of these changes are key elements of the current risk assessment process. FQPA required that EPA consider:

  • A New Safety Standard: FQPA strengthened the safety standard that pesticides must meet before being approved for use. EPA must ensure with a reasonable certainty that no harm will result from the legal uses of the pesticide.
  • Exposure from All Sources: In evaluating a pesticide, EPA must estimate the combined risk from that pesticide from all non-occupational sources, such as:
    • Food Sources
    • Drinking Water Sources
    • Residential Sources
  • Cumulative Risk: EPA is required to evaluate pesticides in light of similar toxic effects that different pesticides may share, or “a common mechanism of toxicity.” Read about how EPA evaluates cumulative risk for pesticides.
  • Special Sensitivity of Children to Pesticides: EPA must ascertain whether there is an increased susceptibility from exposure to the pesticide to infants and children. EPA must build an additional 10-fold safety factor into risk assessments to ensure the protection of infants and children, unless it is determined that a lesser margin of safety will be safe for infants and children.
For More InformationMore information about EPA's pesticide programs.

For more information on specific pesticides, or to inquire about the symptoms of pesticide poisoning, call the National Pesticide Information Center (NPIC), a toll-free hotline information at: 1-800-858-7378, or visit their Web site  .

Assessing Pesticide Cumulative Risk
This website provides information on EPA's

  • process for conducting pesticide cumulative risk assessments,
  • cumulative risk assessment methods and tools, including several exposure assessment models, and
  • cumulative risk assessments for five groups of pesticides, 
    • Organophosphates (OPs)
    • N-methyl carbamates
    • Triazines
    • Chloroacetanilides
    • Pyrethrins/Pyrethroids
Through the pesticide reevaluation program, EPA periodically reviews individual registered pesticides to ensure that they continue to meet statutory standards and can be used without unreasonable risks to human health and the environment. As a result of the Food Quality Protection Act (FQPA), the Agency also must assess the cumulative risks of pesticides that share a common mechanism of toxicity, or act the same way in the body.

EPA has developed a framework for conducting cumulative risk assessments. In assessing cumulative risks, EPA evaluates the potential for people to be exposed to more than one pesticide at a time from a group with an identified common mechanism of toxicity. These cumulative assessments consider exposures from food, drinking water, and residential sources. The Agency also incorporates regional exposures from residential and drinking water sources since this is the most appropriate way to account for the considerable variation in potential exposures across the country. EPA's cumulative assessments, therefore, approximate as closely as possible people's actual exposures and potential risks resulting from current uses of these pesticides in different parts of the country.

The Agency has determined so far that five groups of pesticides each have a common mechanism of toxicity and require cumulative risk assessments because exposure to these pesticide groups may pose potential risks to human health and the environment. The five groups are: the organophosphates, N-methyl carbamates, triazines, chloroacetanilides, and pyrethrins/pyrethroids.

The Agency has determined that two other groups of pesticides, the thiocarbamate and dithiocarbamate pesticides, should not undergo cumulative assessments since chemicals in those two groups do not act the same way in the body. In late 2001 and early 2002, EPA provided an opportunity for the public to comment on the Agency's common mechanism determinations for the thiocarbamates (PDF) (46 pp, 348 KB, About PDF) and dithiocarbamates (PDF) (51 pp, 418 KB, About PDF), which also belong to the carbamate group of pesticides. EPA considered four common effects, including acetyl cholinesterase inhibition, and determined that the thiocarbamates and dithiocarbamates do not share a common mechanism of toxicity.

Through cumulative risk assessment, EPA considers whether the risks posed by a group of pesticides that act the same way in the body meet the safety standard of "reasonable certainty of no harm" established by FQPA. During the development of individual and cumulative risk assessments and subsequent risk management decisions, EPA provides a number of opport



Picture
Picture
Picture
http://www.bluemonarchproject.comPicture
Picture

Home

Talk Show Schedule

Show Health Topics

Podcast

Gardening

Suggest a Topic

News

Blog

About Us



Picture
Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.